Capital for Tech Workers

Conclusion

Marx begins Capital with the commodity as a real abstraction that takes form in the act of exchange because it is the basis through which he will develop a critique of the philosophy of value that emerges from the commodity’s premise. When value is measured solely through a count of the commodities produced and mistaken to represent the actual state of societal wealth, it produces a dynamic that, as we will see, reinforces inequality and leads to structural immiseration. This dynamic is counterintuitive to the way in which capitalists talk about commodification as a rising tide that lifts all boats, and about capitalism as a force that is ultimately uplifting and constructive, rather than darkly destructive and damaging on a number of counts. In order to get to how this dynamic works, we first need to follow Marx’s analysis from Capital’s first chapter through its second and third chapters, where Marx details the important (and insoluble) relationship between the commodity and money.

Discussion Questions

“If the product is free, you are the product”
Is this accurate? What exactly are the commodities in ad-tech? Is it the concepts we typically talk about like user attention or is it something more concrete like space on your screen, or a click-through prediction? Consider how each has distinct use-values and exchange-values within programmatic advertising markets.
Is open source software a commodity?
When tools like Linux, Kubernetes, and PyTorch become core infrastructure, how do firms turn the commons into profit? What mechanisms allow private capital to extract value from collectively-produced software?
Software has a near zero marginal cost
Physical commodities and services require a unique act of labor for each instance, whether that’s a new widget or rendering the service to another person. But software and other digital goods can be replicated at almost no cost. How does this affect its status as a commodity? Does it require special treatment to remain a commodity?